SC: Mere Mention of 'Arbitration' Does not Form Agreement Without Clear Intent  ||  SC: No Entitlement to Job as Compensation for Land Acquired under Land Acquisition Act  ||  SC: Court Cannot Probe Credibility of FIR Allegations While Entertaining Quashing Plea  ||  SC: Notice under Indian Forest Act Does not Transfer Private Forests to Maharashtra Law  ||  SC: Unilateral Termination of Sale Agreement Invalid if Contract Does Not Permit it  ||  NCLAT: Pre-COVID Defaults do not Exempt Debtors From Insolvency Proceedings  ||  NCLAT: Liquidator Must Obtain NCLT Approval Before Conducting Private Sale  ||  NCLAT: Contract Termination for Performance Default Not Barred by CIRP Moratorium  ||  Kerala HC: Partial Specific Performance Not Allowed if Defendant Holds Undisputed Property Title  ||  Kerala HC: Complainant Must be Informed if Probe Against FIR-Named Accused is Dropped    

SC Explains Principles That Appellate Courts Should Follow While Deciding Acquittal Appeals - (15 Feb 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has observed that if through appreciation of evidence two possible views are being made out then the Appellate Court cannot reverse the decision of acquittal by the Trial Court, merely because there exists another view that led to the conviction of the accused.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ACQUITTAL APPEALS   TRIAL COURT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved