MP High Court: Estranged Husband Entitled to Loss of Consortium Compensation After Wife’s Death  ||  J&K & Ladakh HC: Claims under Roshni Act Void Ab Initio, Ownership Rights Null from Inception  ||  Madras High Court Directs Expedited Trials in 216 Pending Criminal Cases Against MPs and MLAs  ||  MP High Court: Allowing Minor to Drive Without Valid License Constitutes Breach of Insurance Policy  ||  Punjab & Haryana High Court: Cyber Fraud Cases Uphold Public Trust, Cannot Be Quashed by Compromise  ||  SC: Customer-Banker Relationship Based on Mutual Trust, Postmaster’s Reinstatement Quashed  ||  Supreme Court: Company Buying Software for Efficiency and Profit Is Not a ‘Consumer’ under CPA  ||  SC: Long Custody or Trial Delay Not Ground for Bail in Commercial Narcotic Cases if S.37 Unmet  ||  Calcutta HC Disqualifies Politician Mukul Roy from Assembly under Anti-Defection Law  ||  Supreme Court Bans Mining in and Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries    

Supreme Court: It Is For the State As Custodian to Assess If Tree-Felling Is Required or Not - (07 Feb 2024)

CIVIL

Supreme Court has conveyed its displeasure at private parties seeking permission to fell trees for industrial projects without first approaching the custodian of subject land and/or providing a concrete plan for compensatory afforestation.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CUSTODIAN   COMPENSATORY AFFORESTATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved