Bombay HC: National Security Justifies Denial of Police Clearance Certificate  ||  Bombay HC: Comic Remarks Without Malicious Intent Not Religious Insult  ||  J&K&L High Court: Scandalous Allegations Against Judicial Officers in Pleadings Impermissible  ||  P&H HC: Writ Petition Against Private Trust's Contractual Employment Dismissed  ||  Gujarat HC: Customary Divorce Entitles Daughter to Family Pension  ||  Calcutta HC: ECI's Prerogative to Deploy Central Employees as Counting Supervisors Upheld  ||  Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers    

Supreme Court: Party Not Diligent at Trial Can’t Seek to Produce Additional Evidence in Appeal - (31 Jan 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court while observing that the power to record additional evidence at the appellate stage should not be exercised in a routine and casual manner, has held that a party who was not diligent in producing evidence at the trial stage of a criminal case cannot seek to produce the same in appeal.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved