SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law  ||  SC: Gratuity May be Withheld While Criminal or Disciplinary Proceedings are Pending Against Employee  ||  SC: Weapon Recovery Useless Without Proof Linking it to Crime under Section 27 Evidence Act  ||  SC: Fines Also Run Concurrently When Sentences For Multiple Offences Run Concurrently  ||  SC Dissolves 10-Year Estranged Marriage, Quashes 80+ Cases in 'Matrimonial Mahabharata' Dispute  ||  SC: Board Resolution Signature Alone Doesn’t Prove Director’s Knowledge of Company Affairs  ||  Raj HC: Industrial Tribunal Allowing Workman Legal Representation But Denying Employer is Unequal  ||  Karnataka HC: Service Bonds Enforceable on Students With Subsidised Education, Not Bonded Labour  ||  Gauhati HC: Challenge to Marks Barred by Constructive Res Judicata When Party Accepts Limited Remand  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaint Can't be Quashed Pre-Trial if Sec 138 NI Act Conditions Met    

Raj HC: Lok Adalat Doesn’t Have Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Disputes of Mobile Tower Installation - (29 Jan 2024)

CIVIL

Rajasthan High Court has held that Permanent Lok Adalat has no jurisdiction to adjudicate matters related to Installation of Mobile Towers as the same is not covered by the definition of 'public utility service' under Section 22A(b) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   PERMANENT LOK ADALAT   MOBILE TOWER INSTALLATION   SECTION 22A(B) OF LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved