NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

All. HC: Denying Pension by Applying Amended Rule Retrospectively Violates Arts. 14 & 16 of COI - (25 Jan 2024)

SERVICE

Allahabad HC has held that denying pension to individual by retrospectively applying Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Appointment and Conditions of Service of the Chairperson and Members) (First Amendment) Rules, 2021 is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India (COI).

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   DENYING PENSION   ARTICLE 14 OF CONSTITUTION   ARTICLE 16 OF CONSTITUTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved