Supreme Court: After the BNSS, a Pre-Cognizance Hearing is Mandatory in PMLA Cases  ||  SC: Landowners Cannot be Forced to Waive Statutory Compensation to Claim Other Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Banks are Lenient With Big Borrowers But Strict With Ordinary Loan Applicants  ||  Delhi HC: Minimum Wages During Pending Litigation Cannot be Frozen and Must be Updated Periodically  ||  Kerala HC: ICC Can Probe Sexual Harassment Complaint Against a Director Not Controlling Affairs  ||  Delhi HC: Interim Protection From Blacklisting Does Not Remove Bidder’s Duty to Disclose in Tenders  ||  Allahabad HC: After the BNSS, Pre-Cognizance Hearing of the Accused is Mandatory in NDPS Complaints  ||  Delhi HC: Husband Cannot Avoid Maintenance For Wife and Children by Claiming Irregular Income  ||  SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law    

Skill Development Scam Case: Split Verdict by SC On Quashing FIR Against Chandrababu Naidu - (16 Jan 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has given split verdict on a plea by Chandrababu Naidu for quashing of first information report against him in skill development scam case. In view of the split in the bench's interpretation of Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, the matter has now referred to a larger bench.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SPLIT VERDICT   CHANDRABABU NAIDU   SKILL DEVELOPMENT SCAM  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved