SC: Forfeiture of Earnest Money Impermissible When Both Buyer and Seller are at Fault  ||  Supreme Court: Gravity of Offence Cannot Defeat Speedy Trial; Pre-Trial Detention is Punishment  ||  SC: Terrorist Act under UAPA Includes Conspiracies to Disrupt Essential Supplies, Not Just Violence  ||  Supreme Court Directs Measures to Prevent False and Frivolous Complaints Against Judicial Officers  ||  SC: Mere Participation in Arbitration Doesn’t Bar Challenging Arbitrator; Waiver Must be in Writing  ||  SC: Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, the Plaintiff, as Dominus Litis, Cannot be Forced to Add a Defendant  ||  SC: Law Does Not Change With a New Bench; Decisions of a Coordinate Bench are Binding  ||  Delhi HC Absence of Formal Arrest under Section 311A Crpc Does Not Bar Giving Handwriting Samples  ||  Del HC: Security Guards Performing Duties Cannot Be Prosecuted For Wrongful Restraint or Molestation  ||  Bombay HC: Housing Society Earning From Telecom Towers Isn’t An ‘Industry’; Staff Get No Gratuity    

Skill Development Scam Case: Split Verdict by SC On Quashing FIR Against Chandrababu Naidu - (16 Jan 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has given split verdict on a plea by Chandrababu Naidu for quashing of first information report against him in skill development scam case. In view of the split in the bench's interpretation of Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, the matter has now referred to a larger bench.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SPLIT VERDICT   CHANDRABABU NAIDU   SKILL DEVELOPMENT SCAM  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved