Supreme Court: Marking a Document as an Exhibit Does Not Prove its Contents  ||  Supreme Court: Unpaid Consideration Alone Does Not Invalidate a Sale Deed  ||  Bombay HC: Questioning Other Varsities' Degrees Could Cause 'Anarchy and Chaos' in Education System  ||  Allahabad High Court: Regularization Claim Survives Employee’s Death Through Legal Heirs  ||  Allahabad HC: Advocates Failing AIBE Within 2 Years of Provisional Enrolment Can’t Continue Practice  ||  Bombay High Court Directs BCI to Scrutinise and Clear Pending Law College Affiliation Approvals  ||  J&K HC: Circulating WhatsApp Message on Local COVID Cases Does Not Attract Section 505 IPC  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Signatory Can Be Bound By an Agreement if Involved in Performing the Contract  ||  Supreme Court: 'Washed-Off Theory' Inapplicable in Assessing Employee Retention Suitability  ||  SC Directs States/UTs to Grant Ex-Servicemen Quota to Cadets Disabled 40% or More in Training    

Skill Development Scam Case: Split Verdict by SC On Quashing FIR Against Chandrababu Naidu - (16 Jan 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has given split verdict on a plea by Chandrababu Naidu for quashing of first information report against him in skill development scam case. In view of the split in the bench's interpretation of Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, the matter has now referred to a larger bench.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SPLIT VERDICT   CHANDRABABU NAIDU   SKILL DEVELOPMENT SCAM  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved