SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law  ||  Supreme Court: Accused Deserves Parity With Discharged Co-Accused if Evidence is Not Stronger  ||  SC Allows Euthanasia of Rabid Stray Dogs if Necessary and Protects Officials Acting in Good Faith  ||  Kerala High Court: University Syndicate Cannot Sue Chancellor as Both Form Same Legal Body  ||  Kerala High Court: Unsigned FIS is Admissible if Informant Confirms its Contents in Court  ||  J&K&L High Court: Purchaser’s Structure on Migrant Land Alone Cannot Block Sale Deed Registration  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law  ||  Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case  ||  Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies    

Skill Development Scam Case: Split Verdict by SC On Quashing FIR Against Chandrababu Naidu - (16 Jan 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has given split verdict on a plea by Chandrababu Naidu for quashing of first information report against him in skill development scam case. In view of the split in the bench's interpretation of Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, the matter has now referred to a larger bench.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SPLIT VERDICT   CHANDRABABU NAIDU   SKILL DEVELOPMENT SCAM  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved