NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Bom. HC: Company Can’t be Compelled to Run Because of Possible Unemployment of Workers - (12 Jan 2024)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Bombay High Court has held that if a Company approaches the Court for closure of its establishment on the ground of accumulated losses in accordance with law, then in that event the possible unemployment of the workers cannot be a ground to compel the Company to run its business and refuse closure.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   COMPANY   UNEMPLOYMENT   WORKERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved