SC: Mere Mention of 'Arbitration' Does not Form Agreement Without Clear Intent  ||  SC: No Entitlement to Job as Compensation for Land Acquired under Land Acquisition Act  ||  SC: Court Cannot Probe Credibility of FIR Allegations While Entertaining Quashing Plea  ||  SC: Notice under Indian Forest Act Does not Transfer Private Forests to Maharashtra Law  ||  SC: Unilateral Termination of Sale Agreement Invalid if Contract Does Not Permit it  ||  NCLAT: Pre-COVID Defaults do not Exempt Debtors From Insolvency Proceedings  ||  NCLAT: Liquidator Must Obtain NCLT Approval Before Conducting Private Sale  ||  NCLAT: Contract Termination for Performance Default Not Barred by CIRP Moratorium  ||  Kerala HC: Partial Specific Performance Not Allowed if Defendant Holds Undisputed Property Title  ||  Kerala HC: Complainant Must be Informed if Probe Against FIR-Named Accused is Dropped    

Bom. HC: Company Can’t be Compelled to Run Because of Possible Unemployment of Workers - (12 Jan 2024)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Bombay High Court has held that if a Company approaches the Court for closure of its establishment on the ground of accumulated losses in accordance with law, then in that event the possible unemployment of the workers cannot be a ground to compel the Company to run its business and refuse closure.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   COMPANY   UNEMPLOYMENT   WORKERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved