Supreme Court: Imminent Death Not Required For a Statement to Qualify as Dying Declaration  ||  SC: HC Cannot Grant Pre-Arrest Bail Without Quashing FIR; Accused Must Approach Sessions Court First  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract  ||  SC: GST Exemption on Residential Lease Applies When Building is Sub-Leased for Hostel/PG Use  ||  Rajasthan High Court: Universities Cannot Retain Students’ Original Documents for Pending Fees  ||  NCLT: Damages from Contractual Disputes Cannot Form Basis for Initiating Insolvency Proceedings  ||  Del HC: Pre-SCN Consultation is Unnecessary in Large-Scale GST Fraud Cases with Complex Transactions  ||  Calcutta HC: Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator Violates Natural Justice and Sets Aside the Award  ||  Raj HC Upholds Padmesh Mishra’s AAG Appointment, Noting Advocacy Skill isn’t Tied to Experience    

Bom. HC: Company Can’t be Compelled to Run Because of Possible Unemployment of Workers - (12 Jan 2024)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Bombay High Court has held that if a Company approaches the Court for closure of its establishment on the ground of accumulated losses in accordance with law, then in that event the possible unemployment of the workers cannot be a ground to compel the Company to run its business and refuse closure.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   COMPANY   UNEMPLOYMENT   WORKERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved