Delhi HC: JD Cannot Move Objections u/s 47 of CPC against Execution of Award  ||  Del HC Refers to Larger Bench the Issue if Suit for Infringement Lies Against Proprietors of TM  ||  Delhi HC: For Wrongful Availment of ITC, Rampant Misuse of S.16 Will Create Enormous Dent  ||  Del. HC: Wife Leaving Work to Take Care of Child Cannot be Called as Voluntary Abandonment  ||  Bombay HC: Wife to Provide Voice Samples to Prove Allegations by Husband of Extra Marital Affair  ||  SC Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sec. 5A of Kerala GST Act & Section 7A of Tamil Nadu GST Act  ||  SC: Use of Volume-Based Rebates Does Not Constitute Abuse of Dominant Position  ||  SC: Under P&C Act Non-Public Servant Can be Convicted for Abetting Offences  ||  SC: IO’s Testimony Based Only on Section 161 CrPC Statements of Witnesses is Not Admissible  ||  NCLT Delhi: Can’t Adjust Payment Made for Specific Invoice Against Back Dated Invoices    

Ker. HC: Unintended Mistake of Magistrate Cannot Attract Prosecution u/s 228 IPC - (11 Jan 2024)

CRIMINAL

Kerala High Court while observing that inadvertent mistake on part of Magistrate can’t lead to action u/s 228 IPC, has held that judicial officers are protected under the Judges (Protection) Act from any action initiated qua an act, thing or word committed during the discharge of judicial functions.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   INADVERTENT MISTAKE   PROSECUTION   JUDGES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved