MP High Court: Women Retain Reservation Benefits After Marriage if Caste is Recognized in Both States  ||  Allahabad HC: Police Must Prosecute Informants of False Firs, and IOs May Face Contempt if They Fail  ||  MP HP: Over-Age Candidate Cannot Claim Age Relaxation Due to Delay in Earlier Recruitment  ||  Kerala HC: Petrol Pump Licence is Automatically Cancelled on Lease Expiry Without Any Hearing  ||  MP HC: Trial Courts Cannot Grant Permanent Injunction in Title Suits Without Recovery of Possession  ||  MP High Court: Guardians Can be Liable For Minors Flying Kites With Chinese Manjha  ||  SC: Under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC, A Transferee Pendente Lite Cannot Obstruct Execution of a Decree  ||  SC: RTE Act promotes fraternity and equality by children of judges and vendors studying together  ||  MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Cards are Not Definitive Proof of Date of Birth  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Second Marriage During Subsisting First Marriage Void Unless Custom Permits It    

Del. HC: Opponent Does Not Have a Right to Intervene in the Examination Process - (11 Jan 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court while observing that an objection is intended to facilitate and assist the Controller in examining the patent application, has held that the opponent can assert a right of hearing only in respect of the representation and not in respect of intervening in the examination process.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   EXAMINATION   PATENT APPLICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved