Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof  ||  SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required  ||  Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt  ||  Supreme Court Quashes ITS Officer's 'Deadwood' Retirement, Orders Rs. 15 Lakh Payment  ||  Uttarakhand HC: District Magistrate to Establish Public Helpline within 24 Hrs amid Water Pollution  ||  Allahabad HC: Custodial Violence and Molestation Are Crimes, Not Police Duty  ||  Gujarat High Court: Bombay Public Trust Registration is Covered by Section 43 of the Waqf Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Advocates not Above Law, No Immunity from Lawful Police Inquiry  ||  Gauhati HC: Talaq-e-Hasan Valid, Requires Registration under Assam Marriage Act  ||  NCLAT: NCLT President Empowered to Transfer Cases from One Bench to Another    

Del. HC: Opponent Does Not Have a Right to Intervene in the Examination Process - (11 Jan 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court while observing that an objection is intended to facilitate and assist the Controller in examining the patent application, has held that the opponent can assert a right of hearing only in respect of the representation and not in respect of intervening in the examination process.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   EXAMINATION   PATENT APPLICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved