NCLAT: Can Set Aside Fraudulent Initiation of CIRP while hearing appeal u/s 61 of IBC  ||  NCLAT: Amount Belonging to Corpo. Debtor Can be Recovered by Liquidator by Filing Application u/s 60  ||  NCLAT: Can Admit Application u/s 7 of IBC if Interest on Principal Amount Crosses Threshold Limit  ||  Del. HC: Magistrates Cannot Question Validity of FIR under their Power to Supervise Investigation  ||  P&H HC: Victim Going With Accused to Crowded Place & Not Raising Alarm Shows Consensual Relationship  ||  Ker. HC: On Nature of Disability, AFT should Not Lightly Interfere with Opinion of Medical Board  ||  HP HC: When Award is Passed Without Giving Reasons, it Suffers from Patent Illegality  ||  SC: Refusing to Marry Someone Doesn’t Attract Offence of Abetment to Suicide  ||  SC: Can’t Deny Experience Marks to Candidate Performing Regular Duties in Unsanctioned Post  ||  NCLAT: Without Payment in Discharge of Guarantee, Guarantor Cannot Become Financial Creditor    

Del. HC: Words of Common English Usage can’t be Monopolized by their Registration as Trade mark - (15 Dec 2023)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court has held that commonly used words, or a non-distinctive combination of commonly used words, cannot be monopolized by any one person, to disentitle the rest of the world to the use, and therefore can’t be registered as trade mark.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   TRADE MARK   MONOPOLY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved