SC: ‘Abandonment of Service is Not Voluntary Retirement’, Denying SBI Clerk Pension Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Stranger Affected by an Interim Order is Entitled to be Impleaded in Writ Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Courts Cannot Replace an Authority’s Discretion, and Sets Aside Direction to Governor  ||  SC: Title Suit Hit by Constructive Res Judicata if Omitted in Prior Injunction Suit Disputing Title  ||  SC Clarifies Whether a Co-Operative Society Can Act as a Resolution Applicant under the IBC  ||  Chhattisgarh High Court: Innocent Litigants Should Not be Penalized For Lapses by Their Lawyers  ||  Delhi High Court: Marriage With the Victim Cannot Absolve an Accused of Rape under POCSO  ||  J&K&L HC: Acquisition Lapses if 80% Compensation is Unpaid Before Possession under Section 17A  ||  Delhi HC: Policy Number is Not Mandatory For LIC Details under RTI, But Basic Details are Required  ||  SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law    

Mad. HC: Unauthorized Occupant Can’t Claim Protection U/A 21 if Eviction is Lawful - (27 Nov 2023)

TENANCY

Madras High Court has held that once it is found that the petitioner was unauthorisedly occupying the government property and if the procedure of law is followed, there is no gainsaying that the petitioner would not be entitled to protection under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Tags : MADRAS HIGH COURT   UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANT   EVICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved