SC: Arrest & Remand Illegal if Grounds Not Given in Language Arrestee Understands  ||  SC: Judgment for Deceased Party is Null if Legal Heir was not Brought on Record Before Hearing  ||  SC: Hiding a Candidate’s Conviction Voids Election, Regardless of Whether it Influenced Results  ||  Delhi HC: Not Here to Monitor Delhi University, but Students Must Follow Law During Elections  ||  J&K&L HC: Paying Tax or GST Registration Doesn’t Legalize Unlicensed Business Activities  ||  Delhi HC: Victim’s Past or Character Cannot be Used to Suggest Consent in Assault Cases  ||  P&H HC: Constitution isn’t Privilege Charter; Reservation in Promotions Requires Statutory Amendment  ||  Kerala HC: Law Must be Amended to Hold Landowners Liable for Illegal Paddy Land Reclamation  ||  Bombay HC: Parents Saying Daughter was Unhappy, Wept Often not Enough to Convict under 498A IPC  ||  Kerala HC: Physiotherapists and Occupational Therapists Cannot Use “Dr.” Without Medical Degree    

SC: For an Arbitration Clause to be Legally Binding it has to be in Consonance with Constitution - (07 Nov 2023)

ARBITRATION

Supreme Court has held that for arbitration clause to be legally binding it has to be in consonance with “operation of law” which includes the Grundnorm i.e. Constitution. It is a settled position of law that there can be no consent against the law and there can be no waiver of fundamental rights.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   CONSTITUTION   ARBITRATION CLAUSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved