MP High Court: Women Retain Reservation Benefits After Marriage if Caste is Recognized in Both States  ||  Allahabad HC: Police Must Prosecute Informants of False Firs, and IOs May Face Contempt if They Fail  ||  MP HP: Over-Age Candidate Cannot Claim Age Relaxation Due to Delay in Earlier Recruitment  ||  Kerala HC: Petrol Pump Licence is Automatically Cancelled on Lease Expiry Without Any Hearing  ||  MP HC: Trial Courts Cannot Grant Permanent Injunction in Title Suits Without Recovery of Possession  ||  MP High Court: Guardians Can be Liable For Minors Flying Kites With Chinese Manjha  ||  SC: Under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC, A Transferee Pendente Lite Cannot Obstruct Execution of a Decree  ||  SC: RTE Act promotes fraternity and equality by children of judges and vendors studying together  ||  MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Cards are Not Definitive Proof of Date of Birth  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Second Marriage During Subsisting First Marriage Void Unless Custom Permits It    

Bom. HC Quashes Rule 6(1) of the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020 - (23 Oct 2023)

CONSUMER

Bombay High Court while quashing Rule 6(1) of the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020, has observed that rule was diluting the involvement of the judiciary and the same was in contravention of the doctrine of separation of powers and also an encroachment on the judicial domain.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   CONSUMER PROTECTION RULES   SEPARATION OF POWERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved