Bombay HC: Insolvency Cannot be Used to Evade a Family Court’s Maintenance Order  ||  Kerala HC: Forklifts and Factory Cranes Are Motor Vehicles and Must be Registered under MV Act  ||  Guj HC: Edible Crude Palm Kernel Oil Qualifies for Duty Exemption; End-Use Condition not Applicable  ||  NCLAT Delhi: Advance under Land-Development MoU is not Financial Debt and Cannot Trigger CIRP  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Cannot Change Capital Structure of a Legally Compliant Successful Auction Purchaser  ||  Supreme Court: Endless Investigation and Long Delay in Filing Chargesheet Can Justify Quashing Case  ||  SC: Landowners Accepting Compensation Settlements Cannot Later Claim Statutory Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Provident Fund Dues Have Priority over a Bank’s Claim under the SARFAESI Act  ||  Supreme Court: Indian Courts Cannot Appoint Arbitrators for Arbitrations Seated Outside India  ||  Madras HC: Police Superintendent not Liable For IO’s Delay In Filing Chargesheet or Closure Report    

SC: Only Person Responsible for the Conduct of Company’s Business is Liable for Dishonour of Cheque - (11 Oct 2023)

BANKING

Supreme Court has held that only that person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge and responsible to the company for the conduct of business, as well as the company alone shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence u/s 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   DISHONOUR OF CHEQUE   COMPANY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved