Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

SC: Only Person Responsible for the Conduct of Company’s Business is Liable for Dishonour of Cheque - (11 Oct 2023)

BANKING

Supreme Court has held that only that person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge and responsible to the company for the conduct of business, as well as the company alone shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence u/s 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   DISHONOUR OF CHEQUE   COMPANY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved