SC: Pre-2015 NH Act Awards Must Follow 1894 Act for Solatium and Interest  ||  SC: Service Rendered Before Regularization Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits  ||  SC: Rajpal Yadav gets Relief from Surrender in Cheque Bounce Case Subject to Rs. 5 Crore Deposit  ||  Gauhati High Court: Local NGOs Cannot Lock Homes Over Alleged Liquor Law Violations  ||  Madras High Court: Environmental, PCB Clearances Not Needed for Medical Essentiality Certificate  ||  Tripura HC: Police Report Not Contemplated By Rules Alone Cannot Be Basis to Deny Premature Release  ||  P&H HC: Senior Citizens Act cannot Remove Estranged Daughter-In-Law from Shared Home  ||  P&H HC: Foreign Licence Alone Does Not Authorize Driving in India  ||  Allahabad HC: Parental Concern Cannot Override Adult’s Choice of Life Partner  ||  Calcutta HC: Defamation Injunction Requires Truth Defence to Be Clearly Unsustainable    

Sanjay Arora v. Unitech Ltd. & Ors. - (National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission) (11 May 2016)

How long can builders keep paying compensation

Consumer

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission passed yet another order against a property developer for its prolonged failure to deliver possession of a flat.

In the instant case, the property developer had defaulted on delivering possession of the flat by over 10 years. Instead, when the complainant stopped payment of instalments, his bank initiated debt recovery proceedings against him.

The Commission awarded the complainant Rs. 60 lakhs, consideration for the flat, and interest at 18 per cent per annum from the date of deposit. Sums were also awarded for mental and physical harassment and towards litigation costs.

The NCDRC hears and disposes several such property disputes on an almost daily basis. Even in the instant case, it noted that a joint claim by 144 complainants was pending against Unitech Ltd. before just this one forum.

Tags : PROPERTY DEVELOPER   POSSESSION   DELAY   COMPENSATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved