Orissa HC: Directors Liable under S.138 NI Act Despite Company’s Insolvency  ||  Bombay HC: GST Return Details of Company Exempt from Disclosure under RTI Act  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Timely Appointment of Electronic Evidence Examiners Vital in Cyber Crime Probes  ||  Bombay HC: GST Return Details of Company Exempt from Disclosure under RTI Act  ||  Bombay HC: GST Return Details of Company Exempt from Disclosure under RTI Act  ||  Bombay HC: Appeal under Section 37 A&C Doesn’t Bar Fresh Arbitration Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Upload Nodal Officer Details on Vatsalya Portal for Missing Child Cases  ||  NCLAT: ED Cannot Keep Attached Assets After Resolution Plan Approval  ||  SC: Gender-Neutral JAG Appointments Judgment Not Retrospective  ||  Supreme Court Rejects Telangana Govt Plea on HC Stay of 42% Backward Classes Reservation    

Sanjay Arora v. Unitech Ltd. & Ors. - (National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission) (11 May 2016)

How long can builders keep paying compensation

Consumer

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission passed yet another order against a property developer for its prolonged failure to deliver possession of a flat.

In the instant case, the property developer had defaulted on delivering possession of the flat by over 10 years. Instead, when the complainant stopped payment of instalments, his bank initiated debt recovery proceedings against him.

The Commission awarded the complainant Rs. 60 lakhs, consideration for the flat, and interest at 18 per cent per annum from the date of deposit. Sums were also awarded for mental and physical harassment and towards litigation costs.

The NCDRC hears and disposes several such property disputes on an almost daily basis. Even in the instant case, it noted that a joint claim by 144 complainants was pending against Unitech Ltd. before just this one forum.

Tags : PROPERTY DEVELOPER   POSSESSION   DELAY   COMPENSATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved