NCLAT: Security to Become Part of Liquidation Estate if Creditor Fails to Deposit Amount in 90 Days  ||  NCLAT: To Reject Application u/s 9 of IBC Reflection of Genuine Pre Existing Dispute Sufficient  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Terminate Lease Hold Rights in Favor of CD During Moratorium Period  ||  NCLT Kochi: As Per IBBI Regulations, Replaced Liquidator Entitled to Minimum 2 Lakh Rupees  ||  Del. HC: Participation in Arbitral Proc. Doesn’t Imply Acceptance of Arbitrator’s Unilateral Appoin.  ||  P&H HC: Measured Legal Response Necessitates Vigilance at Point of Entry  ||  Ker. HC: There is No Personal Law in India Applicable to Christians Recognizing Adoption  ||  SC: Protection under TP Act Not Available to if Party Knew about Pending Litigation  ||  Supreme Court: BCI Has No Authority to Interfere with Legal Education  ||  SC: Party Having No Privity of Contract with Service Provider Can’t be Called ‘Consumer’ under CP Act    

Madras HC: Writing Negative Review About a Service Provider Doesn’t Constitute Defamation - (13 Sep 2023)

CIVIL

Madras High Court while observing that right to free speech covers such expression of one's review for services received in an Online platform, has held that mere expressing views in Google Review about the services that were received by one does not amount to defamation.

Tags : MADRAS HIGH COURT   FREE SPEECH   GOOGLE REVIEW   DEFAMATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved