Inordinate Delay in Execution of Death Sentence has a Dehumanising Effect on Accused  ||  PC Granted to Woman Army Officer Who Was Denied Benefits Given to Similarly Situated Others  ||  If Bodily Injury Caused with Lethal Weapon, Lack of Intention to Cause Murder Irrelevant  ||  Must AddSection 304(II) of IPC In Accidents Involving Drunk Drivers  ||  UGC Amended Regulation Not Binding on State Univ. Affiliated Institutions Without State Adoption  ||  Can Consider Raising Money Through Optional Convertible Debentures as Financial Debt  ||  NCLAT: Section 43(1) of IBC applicable when Corporate Debtor has given a preference in transaction  ||  AP HC Declines Stay on Govt. Memo Permitting Higher Rate for Premiere of Pushpa 2 Movie  ||  SC: Amended Regulations Not Bind State University Affiliated Institutions without State Adoption  ||  MP High Court Issues Guidelines for Safe Travel of School Children    

Kar. HC: Decision of SC Would Not Upset the Earlier Judgments of Competent Court - (26 Jul 2023)

CIVIL

Karnataka High Court has observed that the law laid down by the Apex Court is not binding on judgments passed prior to it by the competent courts and therefore principle of res judicata will apply between the same parties on the same issue.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   APEX COURT   JUDGMENT   RES JUDICATA  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved