Karnataka HC Directs Authorities to Not Grant Permission for Construction Near Protected Monuments  ||  Delhi HC Sets Aside Ruling to the Extent of Restraining Indiamart to Provide ‘PUMA’ Search Option  ||  HP HC Grants Bail to NDPS Accused Citing Delay in Initiating Trial Proceedings  ||  Madras HC: Certification of an Entire Film Cannot be Denied Without Specifying the Objections  ||  J&K HC: Mere Registration of Criminal Case Doesn’t Constitute ‘Criminal Proc.’ for Impounding Passpor  ||  SC Refuses to Entertain Urgent Hearing of Plea Against Felling 875 Trees in HP  ||  SC Refuses to Stop Incineration of Toxic Chemical Waste from Bhopal Gas Tragedy  ||  SC Declines to Interfere with HC’s Order to Decide Schedule for Tiruchendur Temple Consecration  ||  Delhi High Court Grants Interim Relief to Mokobara in Trademark Case  ||  Delhi HC: Students Shouldn’t be Excluded from Admission because of Untimely Declaration of Results    

Pat. HC: Non-Determination of POCSO Victim’s Age Causes Prejudice to the Fair Trial - (19 Jul 2023)

CRIMINAL

Patna High Court has held that non-determination of victim’s age as per Section 34(2) of POCSO Act causes prejudice to fair trial. Non-compliance with such procedural requirements amounts to a failure of justice and the benefit should certainly go in favor of the accused.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   POCSO   AGE   FAIR TRIAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved