AP HC: App. u/s 11(6) Can Only be Maintained if Parties Fail to Refer Dispute to Arbi. Even After Not  ||  Del. HC: Father Held Guilty of Repeatedly Raping Minor Daughter for 2 Years, Acquittal Reversed  ||  SC: Reconsideration Required of the Judgement That Brought Doctors Under Consumer Protection Act  ||  SC: Person Purchasing Prop. Knowing About Appeal Pendency Can’t Claim Restit. as Bona Fide Purchaser  ||  SC: Authorities Directed to Take Immediate Measures Regarding Municipal Solid Waste in Delhi  ||  Del. HC: In-Mall Marketing Campaigns Also Advertisements, HUL Restrained from Comparing Products  ||  Andhra Pradesh HC: Cannot Cancel Selection Process in Absence of Valid, Bonafide Reasons  ||  SC: Cannot Make Advocates Liable for Deficiency of Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986  ||  Cal HC: Not Operating in Totalitarian State, Govt. Can’t Exercise Blanket Power Over Every Instit.  ||  Mad. HC: Can’t Deny Permission of Temple’s Festival on Grounds of Model Code of Conduct    

Bombay HC Stops a Lounge Bar in Belgaum from Using Name “Blu Frog” - (10 May 2016)

Bombay HC restrained operation of lounge bar named “Blu Frog” at a Mall in Belgaum under that name and logo, stating that merely dropping letter 'e' does not take away from the fact that it is tapping in on the credentials of legendary nightclub “Blue Frog”.

Tags : BOMBAY HC   BLU FROG  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved