Supreme Court: Non-Signatory That is Not a Veritable Party Cannot Invoke an Arbitration Clause  ||  SC: Bail Can't be Cancelled For Police Non-Appearance Once Chargesheet is Filed and Trial is Attended  ||  SC: New Arbitration Bill Fails To Provide a Statutory Appeal Against Tribunal Termination Orders  ||  SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity  ||  SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity  ||  Supreme Court: Higher Courts Should Avoid Unnecessary Remand of Cases to Lower Courts  ||  J&K&L HC: Under SARFAESI Act, Borrower's Right To Redeem a Secured Asset Ends With Auction Notice  ||  Calcutta HC: Income Tax Returns Can Be Used to Assess Victim's Income; ?39 Lakh Compensation Granted  ||  Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home  ||  Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing    

Meg. HC: 16 Year Old Person is Capable of Making Conscious Decision Regarding Sexual Intercourse - (23 Jun 2023)

CRIMINAL

Meghalaya High Court has observed that looking into the physical and mental development of an children of age around 16 years, it is logical that such a person is capable of making conscious decision as regard his or her well-being as to the actual act of sexual intercourse.

Tags : MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT   SEXUAL INTERCOURSE   DECISION   16 YEARS OLD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved