Supreme Court: Compassionate Appointees Cannot Later Claim Entitlement to a Higher Post  ||  NCLAT New Delhi: Insolvency Pleas Cannot Be Admitted When Information Utility Records Show a Dispute  ||  NCLAT: Issuing Cheques For Another Entity’s Liabilities Does not Constitute Operational Debt  ||  NCLAT: SEBI Penalties Imposed After Liquidation Begins are Not Admissible as Claims  ||  NCLT Reiterates That an Auction Purchaser is Not Liable For a Corporate Debtor’s Electricity Dues  ||  Delhi HC Upholds Interim Injunction Against 'Power Flex' in Bata’s Trademark Infringement Case  ||  Calcutta High Court: Mere Presence of Alcohol in Post-Mortem Cannot Bar Compensation to Heirs  ||  Kerala High Court: Review Petition Cannot Be Entertained Against an Order Refusing Arbitration  ||  J&K High Court: Umadevi Judgment Does not Justify Perpetual Temporary Employment  ||  SC: Public Premises Act Prevails over State Rent Laws For Evicting Unauthorised Occupants    

Meg. HC: 16 Year Old Person is Capable of Making Conscious Decision Regarding Sexual Intercourse - (23 Jun 2023)

CRIMINAL

Meghalaya High Court has observed that looking into the physical and mental development of an children of age around 16 years, it is logical that such a person is capable of making conscious decision as regard his or her well-being as to the actual act of sexual intercourse.

Tags : MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT   SEXUAL INTERCOURSE   DECISION   16 YEARS OLD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved