Supreme Court: Promotion Suitability Must be Decided by Experts, Courts Cannot Create New Methods  ||  SC: Market Integrity is Paramount; Rule Violators Cannot Escape Liability by Citing Investor Gains  ||  SC: Plaintiff's Reply to Counterclaim in Commercial Suits Must Meet Written Statement Deadline  ||  SC: Pre-2016 Debt Recovery Tribunal Recovery Certificates Cannot Support Insolvency Notices  ||  SC: Children's Court Cannot Try Child as Adult Without Passing a Reasoned Order under JJ Act  ||  SC: Contractual Clauses Denying Interest on Security Deposits Does Not Violate Public Policy  ||  J&K&L HC: Unamended Pleading Loses Effect After Amendment; Party Cannot Benefit From Own Default  ||  Allahabad HC: Wife's Maintenance Need Not be Fixed at 25% of Husband's Net Income  ||  Kerala HC: Social Customs Alone Cannot Prove Bride Entrusted Gold to Husband or In-Laws  ||  Karnataka HC: Century Club Qualifies as a Public Authority under the RTI Act Due to Land Grant    

Meg. HC: 16 Year Old Person is Capable of Making Conscious Decision Regarding Sexual Intercourse - (23 Jun 2023)

CRIMINAL

Meghalaya High Court has observed that looking into the physical and mental development of an children of age around 16 years, it is logical that such a person is capable of making conscious decision as regard his or her well-being as to the actual act of sexual intercourse.

Tags : MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT   SEXUAL INTERCOURSE   DECISION   16 YEARS OLD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved