Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law  ||  Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case  ||  Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies  ||  Delhi High Court: Students Having Zero Attendance Cannot be Promoted to the Next Semester  ||  J&K&L HC: Replacing 'State' With 'Union Territory' in Public Safety Act Does Not Change its Nature  ||  Kerala High Court: Doctor Cannot Enrol as an Advocate Without First Cancelling Medical Registration  ||  Supreme Court: VAT is Not Applicable on Reliance’s Inter-State Gas Supply from KG Basin to UP  ||  Supreme Court: Co-Owner Can File Eviction Suit as Landlord under Bombay Rent Act  ||  Supreme Court: Mediclaim Reimbursement Cannot be Set off Against Accident Compensation  ||  SC: Hindu Succession Act 2005 Amendment Does Not Curtail Daughters’ Existing Inheritance Rights    

Meg. HC: 16 Year Old Person is Capable of Making Conscious Decision Regarding Sexual Intercourse - (23 Jun 2023)

CRIMINAL

Meghalaya High Court has observed that looking into the physical and mental development of an children of age around 16 years, it is logical that such a person is capable of making conscious decision as regard his or her well-being as to the actual act of sexual intercourse.

Tags : MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT   SEXUAL INTERCOURSE   DECISION   16 YEARS OLD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved