Supreme Court: After the BNSS, a Pre-Cognizance Hearing is Mandatory in PMLA Cases  ||  SC: Landowners Cannot be Forced to Waive Statutory Compensation to Claim Other Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Banks are Lenient With Big Borrowers But Strict With Ordinary Loan Applicants  ||  Delhi HC: Minimum Wages During Pending Litigation Cannot be Frozen and Must be Updated Periodically  ||  Kerala HC: ICC Can Probe Sexual Harassment Complaint Against a Director Not Controlling Affairs  ||  Delhi HC: Interim Protection From Blacklisting Does Not Remove Bidder’s Duty to Disclose in Tenders  ||  Allahabad HC: After the BNSS, Pre-Cognizance Hearing of the Accused is Mandatory in NDPS Complaints  ||  Delhi HC: Husband Cannot Avoid Maintenance For Wife and Children by Claiming Irregular Income  ||  SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble  ||  Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law    

Meg. HC: 16 Year Old Person is Capable of Making Conscious Decision Regarding Sexual Intercourse - (23 Jun 2023)

CRIMINAL

Meghalaya High Court has observed that looking into the physical and mental development of an children of age around 16 years, it is logical that such a person is capable of making conscious decision as regard his or her well-being as to the actual act of sexual intercourse.

Tags : MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT   SEXUAL INTERCOURSE   DECISION   16 YEARS OLD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved