NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Union of India v. Harish Chandra Singh Rawat and Anr. - (Supreme Court) (06 May 2016)

Uttarakhand Vote of Confidence on 10 May 2016

Constitution

The Supreme Court gave the go ahead for conducting of floor test in the Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly on 10 May 2016. The only agenda before the Assembly will be the Vote of Confidence sought by Chief Minister Harish Singh Rawat.

The Confidence Motion will not be a voice vote, the very thing that led to allegations of mala fide conduct in the Assembly in the first place, and left the State facing President’s Rule. The floor test will also be video-recorded, with the footage available for perusal with the court. Sealed result of the vote will be presented before the Court on 11 May 2016.

The Court ruled out allowing nine members of the Ruling party in the State who were disqualified for not toeing the party line from participating in the Assembly.

Tags : UTTARAKHAND   VOTE OF CONFIDENCE   FLOOR TEST   DISQUALIFIED MEMBERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved