SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation  ||  Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction of Four Men in a 1998 Gang Rape Case  ||  Supreme Court: Privy Purse Privileges of Princely Rulers are Not Enforceable Legal Rights  ||  Delhi HC: Repeated Court Summons May Distress and Re-Traumatize Child Sexual Assault Victims  ||  Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Labeling Someone as a Terrorist Associate Amounts to Defamation  ||  Delhi HC: Setting Aside or Altering a Judge’s Order by a Higher Court Doesn’t Affect Their Integrity  ||  Delhi High Court: Accused Cannot be Faulted For Smart Replies; Interrogator Must be Sharper  ||  Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration  ||  Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal  ||  Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status    

Union of India v. Harish Chandra Singh Rawat and Anr. - (Supreme Court) (06 May 2016)

Uttarakhand Vote of Confidence on 10 May 2016

Constitution

The Supreme Court gave the go ahead for conducting of floor test in the Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly on 10 May 2016. The only agenda before the Assembly will be the Vote of Confidence sought by Chief Minister Harish Singh Rawat.

The Confidence Motion will not be a voice vote, the very thing that led to allegations of mala fide conduct in the Assembly in the first place, and left the State facing President’s Rule. The floor test will also be video-recorded, with the footage available for perusal with the court. Sealed result of the vote will be presented before the Court on 11 May 2016.

The Court ruled out allowing nine members of the Ruling party in the State who were disqualified for not toeing the party line from participating in the Assembly.

Tags : UTTARAKHAND   VOTE OF CONFIDENCE   FLOOR TEST   DISQUALIFIED MEMBERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved