P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Union of India v. Harish Chandra Singh Rawat and Anr. - (Supreme Court) (06 May 2016)

Uttarakhand Vote of Confidence on 10 May 2016

Constitution

The Supreme Court gave the go ahead for conducting of floor test in the Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly on 10 May 2016. The only agenda before the Assembly will be the Vote of Confidence sought by Chief Minister Harish Singh Rawat.

The Confidence Motion will not be a voice vote, the very thing that led to allegations of mala fide conduct in the Assembly in the first place, and left the State facing President’s Rule. The floor test will also be video-recorded, with the footage available for perusal with the court. Sealed result of the vote will be presented before the Court on 11 May 2016.

The Court ruled out allowing nine members of the Ruling party in the State who were disqualified for not toeing the party line from participating in the Assembly.

Tags : UTTARAKHAND   VOTE OF CONFIDENCE   FLOOR TEST   DISQUALIFIED MEMBERS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved