Supreme Court: GPF Nomination in Favour of a Parent Becomes Invalid Once the Employee Marries  ||  Supreme Court: Candidate Not Disqualified if Core Subject Studied Without Exact Degree Title  ||  Supreme Court: Stamp Duty Relief for Co-Operative Societies Cannot Depend on Extra-Legal Verification  ||  Delhi High Court: Allegations of Forgery Alone Do not Bar NCLT From Examining Company Records  ||  J&K&L HC: Only Revenue Authorities Can Handle Agrarian Resumption; Civil Courts Cannot Intervene  ||  Delhi HC: CAPF Candidate's Height of 164.6 Cm Can be Rounded to 165 Cm; Rejection Prima Facie Illegal  ||  NCLT Mumbai: Bank Cannot Retain OTS Earnest Money After Accepting a Resolution Plan  ||  Supreme Court: Imminent Death Not Required For a Statement to Qualify as Dying Declaration  ||  SC: HC Cannot Grant Pre-Arrest Bail Without Quashing FIR; Accused Must Approach Sessions Court First  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract    

Cal HC: Officers Entitled to Take Action Against Non-Conforming Acts of An Advocate - (13 Jun 2023)

CIVIL

Calcutta High Court while observing that it is not expected that a judge should be a mute spectator, has held that judicial restraint does not disentitle a judicial officer from taking exception against non-conforming acts of an Advocate.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   JUDICIAL RESTRAINT   ADVOCATE   NON-CONFORMING ACTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved