Supreme Court: Single Insolvency Petition Maintainable Against Linked Corporate Entities  ||  Supreme Court: Disputes are Not Arbitrable When the Arbitration Agreement is Alleged to be Forged  ||  Supreme Court: Temple Trust Does Not Qualify as an ‘Industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act  ||  Delhi HC: Unmarried Granddaughter’s Limited Estate Can Become Absolute if Pre-Existing Right  ||  MP High Court: Labour Laws are Beneficial, and Hyper-Technical Limitation Views Must be Avoided  ||  Calcutta HC: Supplementary Chargesheet Filed Late in NDPS Trial is Valid if Based on Fresh Evidence  ||  Delhi High Court: Co-Accused’s Abscondence Can Be a Relevant Factor in Granting NDPS Bail  ||  P &H HC: Unfavourable Orders Cannot Justify Trial Transfer; Courts Must Prevent Forum Hunting  ||  SC: UGC Regulations Override State Law on Forming Search Committees For University VC Appointments  ||  SC: State Cannot Deny Regularisation to Long-Serving Contract Staff Appointed Through Due Process    

Cal HC: Officers Entitled to Take Action Against Non-Conforming Acts of An Advocate - (13 Jun 2023)

CIVIL

Calcutta High Court while observing that it is not expected that a judge should be a mute spectator, has held that judicial restraint does not disentitle a judicial officer from taking exception against non-conforming acts of an Advocate.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   JUDICIAL RESTRAINT   ADVOCATE   NON-CONFORMING ACTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved