Supreme Court: Imminent Death Not Required For a Statement to Qualify as Dying Declaration  ||  SC: HC Cannot Grant Pre-Arrest Bail Without Quashing FIR; Accused Must Approach Sessions Court First  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract  ||  SC: GST Exemption on Residential Lease Applies When Building is Sub-Leased for Hostel/PG Use  ||  Rajasthan High Court: Universities Cannot Retain Students’ Original Documents for Pending Fees  ||  NCLT: Damages from Contractual Disputes Cannot Form Basis for Initiating Insolvency Proceedings  ||  Del HC: Pre-SCN Consultation is Unnecessary in Large-Scale GST Fraud Cases with Complex Transactions  ||  Calcutta HC: Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator Violates Natural Justice and Sets Aside the Award  ||  Raj HC Upholds Padmesh Mishra’s AAG Appointment, Noting Advocacy Skill isn’t Tied to Experience    

Cal HC: Officers Entitled to Take Action Against Non-Conforming Acts of An Advocate - (13 Jun 2023)

CIVIL

Calcutta High Court while observing that it is not expected that a judge should be a mute spectator, has held that judicial restraint does not disentitle a judicial officer from taking exception against non-conforming acts of an Advocate.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   JUDICIAL RESTRAINT   ADVOCATE   NON-CONFORMING ACTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved