SC: Advocate Must Protect Client Confidentiality Even after Client Turns Adversary  ||  SC: Revenue Record Mutation Alone Cannot Defeat a Person’s Property Title  ||  SC: SARFAESI Auction Valid Despite EMD Shortfall Where 25% Price Was Paid on Auction Day  ||  SC: Extended GST Limitation under S.74 Requires Notice to Specify Fraud or Concealment  ||  Allahabad HC Invalidates Key Provisions of Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Law  ||  Delhi HC: Writ Courts Cannot Prescribe Method for Determining Property Tax  ||  Bombay HC: ICC’s ‘No Sexual Element’ Finding Can Be Challenged under POSH Act  ||  Rajasthan HC: Road Widening Demolition Requires Title Claims and Fair Hearing  ||  Allahabad HC: Mere Presence or FIR Nomination is Insufficient for Conviction under Section 149 IPC  ||  MP HC: Employment Secured Through Forged Records Gives No Right to Hold Public Office    

Cal HC: Venue Won’t be Seat of Arbitration if Agreement Confers Jurisdiction on a Different Court - (12 Jun 2023)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has held that presence of a clause which confers exclusive jurisdiction upon a Court in a place other than the venue of arbitration is a ‘Contrary Indicia’ that prevents the venue of arbitration from becoming the seat.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION   SEAT   VENUE   JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved