Supreme Court: Marking a Document as an Exhibit Does Not Prove its Contents  ||  Supreme Court: Unpaid Consideration Alone Does Not Invalidate a Sale Deed  ||  Bombay HC: Questioning Other Varsities' Degrees Could Cause 'Anarchy and Chaos' in Education System  ||  Allahabad High Court: Regularization Claim Survives Employee’s Death Through Legal Heirs  ||  Allahabad HC: Advocates Failing AIBE Within 2 Years of Provisional Enrolment Can’t Continue Practice  ||  Bombay High Court Directs BCI to Scrutinise and Clear Pending Law College Affiliation Approvals  ||  J&K HC: Circulating WhatsApp Message on Local COVID Cases Does Not Attract Section 505 IPC  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Signatory Can Be Bound By an Agreement if Involved in Performing the Contract  ||  Supreme Court: 'Washed-Off Theory' Inapplicable in Assessing Employee Retention Suitability  ||  SC Directs States/UTs to Grant Ex-Servicemen Quota to Cadets Disabled 40% or More in Training    

SC: If Sufficient Evidence of Involvement Exists, Person Not Named in FIR can be Added as Accused - (08 Jun 2023)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that if evidence on record shows the involvement of a person in the commission of a crime, the said person can be arraigned as an accused by exercising power under Section 319 of CrPC and should face trial together with the accused already arraigned.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   EVIDENCE   ACCUSED   FIR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved