Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

Raj HC: Court Can Intervene in Custody Matter Where Parent Agree on Child Custody to One of Them - (08 Jun 2023)

FAMILY

Rajasthan High Court has held that in cases where parties have agreed to allow custody of child to remain with one of them, the custody should be allowed to remain with that party alone unless, it could be demonstrated that continuance of such custody is no longer in welfare of child.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   CHILD CUSTODY   WELFARE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved