Bombay HC: Insolvency Cannot be Used to Evade a Family Court’s Maintenance Order  ||  Kerala HC: Forklifts and Factory Cranes Are Motor Vehicles and Must be Registered under MV Act  ||  Guj HC: Edible Crude Palm Kernel Oil Qualifies for Duty Exemption; End-Use Condition not Applicable  ||  NCLAT Delhi: Advance under Land-Development MoU is not Financial Debt and Cannot Trigger CIRP  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Cannot Change Capital Structure of a Legally Compliant Successful Auction Purchaser  ||  Supreme Court: Endless Investigation and Long Delay in Filing Chargesheet Can Justify Quashing Case  ||  SC: Landowners Accepting Compensation Settlements Cannot Later Claim Statutory Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Provident Fund Dues Have Priority over a Bank’s Claim under the SARFAESI Act  ||  Supreme Court: Indian Courts Cannot Appoint Arbitrators for Arbitrations Seated Outside India  ||  Madras HC: Police Superintendent not Liable For IO’s Delay In Filing Chargesheet or Closure Report    

Restriction on EPF withdrawal- (Ministry of Labour and Employment) (05 May 2016)

MANU/PIBU/0411/2016

Labour and Industrial

The Minister for Labour and Employment outlined the restrictions on withdrawal of funds from the Employees Provident Fund Scheme. Instances when withdrawal can be made include retirement from service after 55 years of age, migration or permanent settlement abroad, and cessation of employment.

Relevant : Employees Provident Funds (Amendment) Scheme, 2016 MANU/LABR/0010/2016

Tags : EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND   WITHDRAWAL   LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved