P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court || Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long || Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo || Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision || Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act || Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself || Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession || SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings || SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order || NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions

Restriction on EPF withdrawal- (Ministry of Labour and Employment) (05 May 2016)

MANU/PIBU/0411/2016

Labour and Industrial

The Minister for Labour and Employment outlined the restrictions on withdrawal of funds from the Employees Provident Fund Scheme. Instances when withdrawal can be made include retirement from service after 55 years of age, migration or permanent settlement abroad, and cessation of employment.

Relevant : Employees Provident Funds (Amendment) Scheme, 2016 MANU/LABR/0010/2016

Tags : EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND WITHDRAWAL LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Share :