Allahabad HC: MPs, Judges and Ministers May Use ‘Hon’ble’; Civil Servants are Not Entitled to it  ||  Calcutta HC: Salary Withholding and Harassment Claims are Not Defamation Without Reputational Harm  ||  Gauhati HC: Officer Resigning Without New Govt Appointment Cannot Claim Pension under Assam Service  ||  MP HC: Attachment & Auction are Quasi-Judicial Duties of Tehsildar; Action Invalid Without Mala Fide  ||  Supreme Court: Fence-Sitters Cannot Raise Seniority Disputes Once Third-Party Rights are Settled  ||  SC: Medical Negligence Claims Can be Filed Against Deceased Doctor’s Legal Heirs Who Inherit Estate  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Must Be Considered if Speedy Trial Rights are Violated, Regardless of Offence  ||  Supreme Court: Article 226 Cannot be Used to Seek FIR Registration Without Exhausting Remedies  ||  SC: Dowry Deaths Remain a Grave Social Issue, Especially in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Karnataka  ||  Supreme Court Outlines Principles Governing Exercise of Jurisdiction under Article 227    

Cal. HC: Consolidated Claim from Different Purchase Order Containing Arbitration Clause Not Invalid - (18 May 2023)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has held that arbitration clauses in different purchase orders that are linked to a single main contract can be treated as a consolidated claim under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION   PURCHASE ORDERS   MAIN CONTRACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved