Supreme Court: Marking a Document as an Exhibit Does Not Prove its Contents  ||  Supreme Court: Unpaid Consideration Alone Does Not Invalidate a Sale Deed  ||  Bombay HC: Questioning Other Varsities' Degrees Could Cause 'Anarchy and Chaos' in Education System  ||  Allahabad High Court: Regularization Claim Survives Employee’s Death Through Legal Heirs  ||  Allahabad HC: Advocates Failing AIBE Within 2 Years of Provisional Enrolment Can’t Continue Practice  ||  Bombay High Court Directs BCI to Scrutinise and Clear Pending Law College Affiliation Approvals  ||  J&K HC: Circulating WhatsApp Message on Local COVID Cases Does Not Attract Section 505 IPC  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Signatory Can Be Bound By an Agreement if Involved in Performing the Contract  ||  Supreme Court: 'Washed-Off Theory' Inapplicable in Assessing Employee Retention Suitability  ||  SC Directs States/UTs to Grant Ex-Servicemen Quota to Cadets Disabled 40% or More in Training    

Cal. HC: Consolidated Claim from Different Purchase Order Containing Arbitration Clause Not Invalid - (18 May 2023)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has held that arbitration clauses in different purchase orders that are linked to a single main contract can be treated as a consolidated claim under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION   PURCHASE ORDERS   MAIN CONTRACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved