Delhi High Court: Providing Email Services Does Not Make Google a Public Functionary  ||  Patna HC: Lying on a Woman Without Any Act Toward Penetration Rules Out Attempted Rape  ||  Delhi High Court: Litigants Cannot Claim a Bench Change as a Right After Roster Changes  ||  Calcutta High Court: Peaceful Protest is a Democratic Right and Cannot Be Treated as an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Trial Courts Must Verify an Accused’s Address Before Declaring Absconding  ||  Gujarat High Court: Judicial Officer Cannot Seek HC Judge’s Transfer over Housing Grievance  ||  Delhi High Court Orders 125 Websites Using Jio Trademark for Lottery and Gaming to Be Suspended  ||  MP High Court Strikes Down 27% OBC Quota, Restores Reservation to 14%  ||  Supreme Court: Hindu Widow’s Limited Estate Became Absolute under Succession Act  ||  Supreme Court: Prima Facie Arbitration Agreement Requires Referral to Arbitration    

Cal. HC: Consolidated Claim from Different Purchase Order Containing Arbitration Clause Not Invalid - (18 May 2023)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has held that arbitration clauses in different purchase orders that are linked to a single main contract can be treated as a consolidated claim under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION   PURCHASE ORDERS   MAIN CONTRACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved