SC: Under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC, A Transferee Pendente Lite Cannot Obstruct Execution of a Decree  ||  SC: RTE Act promotes fraternity and equality by children of judges and vendors studying together  ||  MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Cards are Not Definitive Proof of Date of Birth  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Second Marriage During Subsisting First Marriage Void Unless Custom Permits It  ||  Allahabad HC: Will in Favor of Someone Does Not Affect Compassionate Appointment Based on Dependency  ||  MP High Court: Mere Illness of a Family Member, If Improving, is Not Sufficient for Interim Bail  ||  Bombay HC: ?25K Fine for Flying Kites With Nylon Manjha; Parents Must Ensure Responsible Conduct  ||  Delhi High Court: Home State Must be the First Preference For Claiming Insider IFS Cadre Allocation  ||  SC: Hindu Daughter-In-Law Widowed After Her Father-In-Law’s Death is Entitled to Maintenance  ||  SC: Vendor Remains a Necessary Party in Specific Performance Suits Even After Transferring Property    

All. HC: Notice Not Invalid if Other Amount is Separately Indicated Along With Cheque Amount - (15 May 2023)

BANKING

Allahabad High Court has held that to make a valid demand notice as per proviso of section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, notice should be mentioned in a separate portion of due amount of bounced cheque, and other amounts which are additionally claimed i.e. interest of loss, cost, etc.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   CHEQUE AMOUNT   NOTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved