Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

All. HC: Notice Not Invalid if Other Amount is Separately Indicated Along With Cheque Amount - (15 May 2023)

BANKING

Allahabad High Court has held that to make a valid demand notice as per proviso of section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, notice should be mentioned in a separate portion of due amount of bounced cheque, and other amounts which are additionally claimed i.e. interest of loss, cost, etc.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   CHEQUE AMOUNT   NOTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved