Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

Cal. HC Quashed Rape Case Where Question of Marriage Arose After Consensual Physical Relationship - (01 May 2023)

CRIMINAL

Calcutta High Court while quashing proceedings against accused for alleged offence of rape, has observed that if physical relationship between accused and victim was consensual and issue of marriage cropped up after such relations, the same would not amount to false promise to marry.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   RAPE   FALSE PROMISE TO MARRY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved