Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC  ||  Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt  ||  Supreme Court: S.69 GST Arrest Order with “Reasons to Believe” Must Precede Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Winding-Up Proceedings Period Cannot be Excluded under Section 14 Limitation Act  ||  Supreme Court: Separate Appeals Unnecessary Against Common Judgment on Suit and Counterclaim  ||  Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Post-Award Section 9 Relief in Exceptional Cases  ||  Delhi HC Rejects Black Money Act Challenge, Imposes Rs. 60,000 Costs over Prosecution Avoidance  ||  Delhi HC Affirms Teacher's POCSO Conviction, Urges Schools to Encourage Children to Speak Up  ||  Kerala HC: NGO Funding Peaceful Protests Can't Justify FCRA Renewal Denial  ||  Delhi HC: Courts Cannot Judge Sufficiency of Material For Issuing Look Out Circular    

Bom. HC: Parents Don’t Hold Absolute Rights Over Destiny of Their Children - (12 Apr 2023)

FAMILY

Bombay High Court while observing that children cannot be treated as property of parents, and don’t have absolute rights over the destiny and life of their children, has held that in matrimonial dispute if parent stop seeing reasons, courts must exercise the parent patriae jurisdiction.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   PARENTS   MATRIMONIAL DISPUTE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved