SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation  ||  Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction of Four Men in a 1998 Gang Rape Case  ||  Supreme Court: Privy Purse Privileges of Princely Rulers are Not Enforceable Legal Rights  ||  Delhi HC: Repeated Court Summons May Distress and Re-Traumatize Child Sexual Assault Victims  ||  Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Labeling Someone as a Terrorist Associate Amounts to Defamation  ||  Delhi HC: Setting Aside or Altering a Judge’s Order by a Higher Court Doesn’t Affect Their Integrity  ||  Delhi High Court: Accused Cannot be Faulted For Smart Replies; Interrogator Must be Sharper  ||  Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration  ||  Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal  ||  Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status    

SC: Service Rendered as Contractual Employee Won't Qualify for Pensionary Benefits - (29 Mar 2023)

SERVICE

Supreme Court while observing that Service rendered as contractual cannot be said to be service rendered on a substantive appointment has held that neither Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules 1972 nor regularization scheme provide that such services shall be counted for pensionary benefits.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PENSIONARY BENEFITS   CONTRACTUAL EMPLOYEE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved