SC: SARFAESI Act Was Not Applicable in Nagaland Before its 2021 Adoption, Dismisses Creditor’s Plea  ||  SC: Lis Pendens Applies To Money Suits on Mortgaged Property, Including Ex Parte Proceedings  ||  Kerala HC: Civil Courts Cannot Grant Injunctions in NCLT Matters and Such Orders Can Be Set Aside  ||  Bombay High Court: Technical Breaks to Temporary Employees Cannot Deny Maternity Leave Benefits  ||  NCLAT: Appellate Jurisdiction Limited to Orders Deciding Parties’ Rights, Not Procedural Directions  ||  NCLAT: Personal Guarantors Involved In NCLT Proceedings Can Appeal Against Insolvency Admission  ||  Supreme Court: Foreign Companies’ Head Office Expenses in India are Capped under Section 44C  ||  SC Directs Trial Courts to Systematically Catalogue Witnesses and Evidence in Criminal Judgments  ||  SC Calls For Sensitising Future Generations on Equality in Marriage to Combat Dowry Practices  ||  SC: Separate Suits Against Confirmed Auction Sales are Barred; Remedy Available under Sec 47    

Cal. HC: Male Counterpart Have a Discounted Relevance in Assisted Reproductive Technology Process - (27 Mar 2023)

LAW OF MEDICINE

Calcutta High Court has observed that if omissions under various provisions of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Act, 2021 are read together it appears that Act has discounted the relevance of a man as a part of a commissioning couple and even as a necessary part of ART altogether.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY   COUPLE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved