Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children  ||  Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims  ||  Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations  ||  Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary  ||  Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother  ||  Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly  ||  Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay  ||  Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State  ||  Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders    

Execution of ECHR judgment in Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia - (19 Apr 2016)

Global power play spills into Russian court

Human Rights

Russia’s Constitutional Court ruled against acceding to a European Court of Human Rights denouncement against Russian law that prohibits prisoners from exercising their voting rights while imprisoned.

The ECHR had stated in an earlier order that disenfranchisement was a disproportional sanction and there did not exist a discernible link between electoral exclusion and the conduct of the individual concerned. Being indiscriminate and automatic, the practice was contradictory to the International Convention on Human Rights and Basic Freedoms.

Russia’s court was succinct in its ruling, terming it “impossible” to execute the ECHR judgment and effecting amendment in the Russian constitution. Though the severity of the offence could convince a judge to reconsider application of the penalty, the two citizens embroiled in the instant case would not be granted such amnesty due to the graveness of their crimes.

Tags : RUSSIA   CONSTITUTION   DISENFRANCHISEMENT   ECHR   PRISONER RIGHTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved