Manipur HC: State Establishments Must Record Transgender Person’s New Name & Gender in Documents  ||  Delhi HC: Failure to Frame Counter Claim Despite Pleadings is Patently Illegal  ||  Mumbai Commission Holds Reliance Retail Liable for Defective AC Replacement Failure  ||  SC Orders ASI to Supervise Repair of Mehrauli’s Ancient Dargahs  ||  SC Reprimands Bihar IPS Officer for Affidavit Supporting Murder Convict  ||  SC Rejects Review Plea on WB SSC Jobs, Upholds Quashing of 25k Appointments  ||  SC Rejects Review Plea on WB SSC Jobs, Upholds Quashing of 25k Appointments  ||  Supreme Court Orders Haridwar Collector Inquiry into Maa Chandi Devi Trust  ||  SC Recommends Statutory Appeal Against DJ’s Compensation Orders  ||  SC Dismisses Petition Challenging 2024 Maharashtra Assembly Elections Over Bogus Voting    

Marie-Emmanuelle Verhoeven v. Union of India & ors. - (Supreme Court) (28 Apr 2016)

Valid extradition treaty between India and Chile; MEA lambasted for lax attitude

Criminal

India and Chile have subsisting between them a valid extradition treaty, under the Extradition Act 1962, the Supreme Court held.

The Court also concluded that even if such a binding commitment did not exist, “the principle of reciprocity and the general principles of international law for extraditing the Petitioner from India… do not debar requisition by Chile.” It delved into history of extradition law in India and chastised the Ministry of External Affairs for misleading citizens that India and Chile had entered into an extradition treaty in 2015. The Ministry’s “relaxed attitude” was also rebuked in light of India’s growing global clout.

Marie-Emmanuelle Verhoeven, the Petitioner, a French nation is accused of being a conspirator in the assassination of a Chilean senator in 1991. Previous extradition attempts in Germany and in India have proved unsuccessful for the Chilean government.

Tags : EXTRADITION   TREATY   CHILE   MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved