Rajasthan High Court: No Law for Conducting Arrest through Video Calls  ||  Gauhati HC Stays Operation of Two Amendments to the Nagaland Lokayukta Act  ||  Mad. HC: “Sexual Harassment” as Seen from PoSH Act Gives Significance to the Act than the Intention  ||  Del. HC: Restriction u/s 37 of NDPS Act Cannot take Precedence Over Accused’s Right u/a 21  ||  Ker. HC: Creating Geographical Restriction for an Escort Visit Can’t be Considered Violation of FRs  ||  Bom. HC: Can Proceed with Trial if Accused Neither Appears Nor Seeks Exemption from Attendance  ||  Bom. HC: Cannot Breach Fundamental Rights of Residents Merely because they Feed Dogs  ||  Del. HC: While Calculating Compensation, Family Pension Paid to Deceased’s Family Cannot be Deducted  ||  Del. HC: Department Can't Hold Compliance once Court Orders Release of Bank Guarantee by Trader  ||  Allahabad HC: Cannot Claim Use of Loudspeakers as a Matter of Right    

SC to Judges: Be Cautious While Making Adverse Remarks During Live Streaming - (22 Mar 2023)

CIVIL

Supreme Court while observing that remarks made during live-streaming have far reaching consequences has cautioned judges against passing adverse remarks against parties involved, and must do so with proper justification, in the right forum, and only if it is necessary to meet the ends of justice.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ADVERSE REMARKS   LIVE-STREAMING   JUDGES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved