Kerala HC: The More Popular You Become, Your Rights Also Diminish to That Extent  ||  SC: Right Claimed Under A. 29 for Preserving Language Can’t Result in an Absolute Right  ||  Bombay High Court: Person Shaking Neck Towards Woman While Riding is Not Stalking  ||  SC: By Operation of S. 31(7)(b), Sum Directed to be Paid Under Arbitral Award Shall Carry Interest  ||  SC: By Operation of S. 31(7)(b), Sum Directed to be Paid Under Arbitral Award Shall Carry Interest  ||  Ker. HC: Physical Contact as Part of Resistance Can’t be Called Explicit Sexual Overture  ||  Delhi High Court: Bail Granted by Court on Merits, if Withheld Will Amount to Punishment  ||  Del. HC: Prosecution and Legal Departments to Exercise Due Diligence before Initiating Cases  ||  BCI Writes Letter to CJI Suggesting Regular Evaluation of Mental Health of Judicial Officers  ||  Delhi High Court: Arbitral Award Set Aside Due to Failure of Arbitrator to Disclose Conflict    

SC: Judgment Allowing Circumstantial Evidence Doesn’t Dilute Need of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt - (21 Mar 2023)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has observed that the Constitution Bench judgment that direct evidence of demand or acceptance of bribe is not necessary for a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 does not dilute the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT   CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE   REASONABLE DOUBT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved