SC: Mere Mention of 'Arbitration' Does not Form Agreement Without Clear Intent  ||  SC: No Entitlement to Job as Compensation for Land Acquired under Land Acquisition Act  ||  SC: Court Cannot Probe Credibility of FIR Allegations While Entertaining Quashing Plea  ||  SC: Notice under Indian Forest Act Does not Transfer Private Forests to Maharashtra Law  ||  SC: Unilateral Termination of Sale Agreement Invalid if Contract Does Not Permit it  ||  NCLAT: Pre-COVID Defaults do not Exempt Debtors From Insolvency Proceedings  ||  NCLAT: Liquidator Must Obtain NCLT Approval Before Conducting Private Sale  ||  NCLAT: Contract Termination for Performance Default Not Barred by CIRP Moratorium  ||  Kerala HC: Partial Specific Performance Not Allowed if Defendant Holds Undisputed Property Title  ||  Kerala HC: Complainant Must be Informed if Probe Against FIR-Named Accused is Dropped    

Ker. HC: Absence of TI Parade Doesn’t Vitiate Identification of Accused in Court - (03 Mar 2023)

CRIMINAL

Kerala High Court has held that if ocular evidence and identification of accused by witnesses in court are impressive, nothing restricts court from relying upon said identification, as even in absence of test identification (TI) parade, recognizing accused in court is substantive evidence.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   TEST IDENTIFICATION PARADE   EVIDENCE   WITNESS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved