Calcutta HC: In Framing Arbitration Agreement Words Used Must be Certain, Definite  ||  J&K HC: Can’t Evaluate Performance of Employee When on Sanctioned Leave During Covid  ||  Kerala HC: Public Paying Toll Fees Casts Responsibility on NHAI to Ensure Smooth Traffic  ||  Calc. HC: Writ Court Rejecting Claims Over Disputed Issues Doesn’t Bar Arbitration if Clause Exists  ||  Gujarat HC Notifies Revised SOP for Virtual/Hybrid Hearing of Cases  ||  Kerala HC: Mere Assessment of Mental Illness by Referring to Mental Health Board Won’t Serve Purpose  ||  Bom. HC Upholds Validity of 7th proviso inserted in S. 2(b) of Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act  ||  SC to Suspend Operation of Committee Under UP Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025  ||  SC Recalls Direction to Remove Allahabad HC Judge from Criminal Jurisdiction after CJI’s Request  ||  Supreme Court: Enforcement Directorate Cannot Act Like a "Crook"    

Or. HC: Horizontal Quota for Particular Social Category Can’t be Filed by Person of Other Category - (01 Mar 2023)

SERVICE

Orissa High Court has held that principle of mobility as applicable in case of social (vertical) reservations are not applicable to special (horizontal) reservation, which implies that the special reservations like women etc. have to be confined to their respective social categories.

Tags : ORISSA HIGH COURT   RESERVATION   HORIZONTAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved