SC: Ex-Contract Workers Must Be Preferred When Employers Replace Contract Labour With Regular Staff  ||  SC: Waqf Tribunals Cannot Hear Claims over Properties Not Listed or Registered under Waqf Act  ||  Supreme Court: Stray Dog Attacks on Beaches Adversely Impact Tourism  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Court Employees Cannot Enroll as Regular LLB Students in Breach of Service Rules  ||  Kerala HC: Telling Someone to "Go Away And Die" in Anger Does Not Amount to Abetment of Suicide  ||  Kerala HC: High Courts Work On Holidays; Denying Compensatory Leave To Officers Violates Art. 229  ||  Del HC: Probationers are ‘Workmen’ under ID Act; S.17B Wages not Recoverable if Termination Upheld  ||  Supreme Court: Confession Without Corroboration Cannot Form the Basis of Conviction  ||  SC: Higher Land Acquisition Compensation to Some Owners Cannot Invalidate Awards to Others  ||  SC: Prior Written Demand is Not Mandatory For an Industrial Dispute to Exist or be Referred    

Del. Court: Mentioning Looks Without Reference to Dress or Body Part is not Sexually Colored Remark - (20 Feb 2023)

CRIMINAL

Patiala House Court, Delhi has held that mentioning looks and gait of a person without any specific reference to the dress or any body part of a person would not be considered as sexually colored remark.

Tags : PATIALA HOUSE COURT   SEXUALLY COLORED REMARK   DRESS   BODY PART  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved