Delhi HC: Workman Cannot Claim Section 17(B) of the ID Act Wages after Reaching Superannuation Age  ||  Allahabad HC: Caste by Birth Remains Unchanged Despite Conversion or Inter-Caste Marriage  ||  Delhi High Court: Tweeting Corruption Allegations Against Employer Can Constitute Misconduct  ||  Delhi High Court: State Gratuity Authorities Lack Jurisdiction over Multi-State Establishments  ||  Kerala High Court: Arrest Grounds Need Not Mention Contraband Quantity When No Seizure is Made  ||  SC: Silence During Investigation Does Not Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation to Deny Bail  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Re-Examine Answer Keys Even in Judicial Service Exams  ||  SC: Central Government Employees under CCS Rules are Not Covered by the Payment of Gratuity Act  ||  Supreme Court Holds CrPC Principles on Discharge and Framing of Charges Continue under BNSS  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Must Independently Assess SC/ST Act Charges in Section 14A Appeals    

Del. HC: Mentioning Looks Without Reference to Dress or Body Part is not Sexually Colored Remark - (20 Feb 2023)

CRIMINAL

Patiala House Court, Delhi has held that mentioning looks and gait of a person without any specific reference to the dress or any body part of a person would not be considered as sexually colored remark.

Tags : PATIALA HOUSE COURT   SEXUALLY COLORED REMARK   DRESS   BODY PART  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved