Supreme Court Urged Railways to Drop the Term Second-Class Passengers  ||  Supreme Court: Employers Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointments Through Delays  ||  Supreme Court Explains How Testimony of a Dead Witness Can be Used Against an Absconding Accused  ||  SC Recommended Amending IBC to Ensure Fair Repayment Protection for MSME Operational Creditors  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Reappreciate Evidence in Certiorari Jurisdiction  ||  SC: Railways are Not Liable Unless Owner-Risk Goods Were Counted or Weighed  ||  SC: Courts and Prosecutors Must Expedite Trials For Jailed Accused  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies that Swear Words and Vulgar Expletives Alone do Not Constitute Obscenity  ||  Supreme Court: Nominated Town Panchayat Members Have No Voting Rights in Council Polls  ||  Delhi High Court Declines Interim Relief to Sonam Wangchuk, Upholds His Hospitalization    

JKL HC: Accused Can't Choose Place of Prosecution Citing Unfounded Security Apprehensions - (14 Feb 2023)

CRIMINAL

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court while dismissing plea filed by social activist seeking transfer of a defamation complaint, has observed that accused cannot be allowed to have a place of his choice to be prosecuted by taking refuge of unfounded personal security apprehensions.

Tags : JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT   TRANSFER   SECURITY APPREHENSIONS   DEFAMATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved