Supreme Court: Companies Can Face Prosecution Without Individual Officers Being Named  ||  SC: Penalties on Insolvent Developers cannot be Recovered from Homebuyers as CIRP Costs  ||  Allahabad HC: ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ Hits Sovereignty, Unlike ‘Allahu-Akbar’, ‘Jai Shri Ram’  ||  Kerala High Court: Married Woman Cannot Claim Sex Was Based Solely on Promise of Marriage  ||  Madras High Court Refuses Equal Recitation of Tamil Hymns With Sanskrit at Meenakshi Temple  ||  Delhi HC: Absence of ‘Penetration’ In Child Victim’s Testimony Not Enough to Acquit Rape Accused  ||  J&K High Court: Possession of Allegedly Anti-National Book Cannot Justify Preventive Detention  ||  Delhi High Court: DNA Evidence Proves Sexual Intercourse, Not Consent  ||  Madras High Court Upholds Appointment of District Judges as Tamil Nadu Lokayukta Secretary  ||  Allahabad High Court: IO’s Mere Apprehension Cannot Justify Withholding Seized Items    

JKL HC: Accused Can't Choose Place of Prosecution Citing Unfounded Security Apprehensions - (14 Feb 2023)

CRIMINAL

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court while dismissing plea filed by social activist seeking transfer of a defamation complaint, has observed that accused cannot be allowed to have a place of his choice to be prosecuted by taking refuge of unfounded personal security apprehensions.

Tags : JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT   TRANSFER   SECURITY APPREHENSIONS   DEFAMATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved