Madras HC: Police Superintendent not Liable For IO’s Delay In Filing Chargesheet or Closure Report  ||  Supreme Court: Provident Fund Dues Have Priority over a Bank’s Claim under the SARFAESI Act  ||  SC Holds Landowners Who Accept Compensation Settlements Cannot Later Seek Statutory Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Endless Investigations and Long Delays in Chargesheets Can Justify Quashing  ||  Delhi HC: Arbitrator Controls Evidence and Appellate Courts Cannot Reassess Facts  ||  Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint  ||  Delhi HC: ED Can Search Anyone Holding Crime Proceeds, not Just Those Named in Complaint  ||  Delhi HC: Economic Offender Cannot Seek Travel Abroad For Medical Treatment When Available In India  ||  SC: Governors and President Have No Fixed Timeline To Assent To Bills; “Deemed Assent” is Invalid  ||  SC: Assigning a Decree For Specific Performance of a Sale Agreement Does Not Require Registration    

Madras HC Asks State "Why Don't You Close Retail TASMAC Outlets By 9:30 PM Instead Of 10 PM?" - (23 Jan 2023)

COMMERCIAL

Madras High Court has recently asked the state government if it was reasonable to close the retail liquor vending shops associated with TASMAC by 9:30 pm and keep the bars running till 10 pm so that the last minute consumers do not end up consuming alcohol on the streets.

Tags : MADRAS HIGH COURT   TASMAC   ALCOHOL   LIQUOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved