Supreme Court: Second Bail Order Must Record Changed Circumstances or Fresh Grounds  ||  SC: Severity of Injury Alone Cannot Prove Attempt to Murder Without Intent to Cause Death  ||  SC: Promissory Estoppel Cannot Be Used to Claim Unintended Benefits, Lays Down Principles  ||  Kerala High Court: No Unrestricted RTI; DPDP Act Strengthens Privacy Framework  ||  Allahabad High Court: Juvenile Offence Case Does Not Bar Govt Job In Adulthood  ||  Gauhati HC: Burden Of Proving Citizenship Stays With Proceedee and Does Not Shift At Any Stage  ||  Delhi HC: Property Disputes Between In-Laws and Daughter-In-Law are Not Exclusively For Family Court  ||  Delhi High Court: After Probate is Granted, A Will Does Not Require Fresh Proof under Section 68  ||  Ker HC: Periodic Replacement and Maintenance of Prosthetic Limb Must Be Included in Compensation  ||  Madras High Court: DNA Test Not Required For Mother to Donate Kidney to Her Son    

Cal. HC: Shouldn’t Interfere With Single Judge Order Merely Because it Has Different Opinion - (13 Jan 2023)

CIVIL

Calcutta High Court has held that division benches should not interfere with well-considered single-judge orders under challenge in intra-court appeals, only because it may have a different opinion.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   DIVISION BENCH   INTERFERE   INTRA-COURT APPEAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved