P&H HC Directs SSP to Respond on Serious Allegation of Custodial Violence by Punjab Police  ||  SC: Market Value of Acquired Land Must be Determined From the Date of Issuance of S. 11 Notification  ||  SC: Hospital Vicariously Liable for Doctor’s Negligence  ||  SC: After Bar Council term Ends, Muslim Member Appointed on that Ground Can't Remain on Waqf Board  ||  SC: Compensation must be Directly Transferred to Road Accident Victims and Workmen  ||  SC: HCs Must Ensure S. 313 CrPC (S.351 BNSS) Compliance at Earliest To Avoid Acquittals  ||  SC Stays Delhi HC’s Direction to Azure Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. to pay PPL as Per Tariff of RMPL  ||  IP Office Declares Starbucks, NDTV and Economic Times as Well-Known Trademark  ||  IP Office Declares Starbucks, NDTV and Economic Times as Well-Known Trademark  ||  Allahabad HC: Liking a Post Does Not Amount to Publishing or Transmitting it    

Cal. HC: Shouldn’t Interfere With Single Judge Order Merely Because it Has Different Opinion - (13 Jan 2023)

CIVIL

Calcutta High Court has held that division benches should not interfere with well-considered single-judge orders under challenge in intra-court appeals, only because it may have a different opinion.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   DIVISION BENCH   INTERFERE   INTRA-COURT APPEAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved