Rajasthan High Court: No Law for Conducting Arrest through Video Calls  ||  Gauhati HC Stays Operation of Two Amendments to the Nagaland Lokayukta Act  ||  Mad. HC: “Sexual Harassment” as Seen from PoSH Act Gives Significance to the Act than the Intention  ||  Del. HC: Restriction u/s 37 of NDPS Act Cannot take Precedence Over Accused’s Right u/a 21  ||  Ker. HC: Creating Geographical Restriction for an Escort Visit Can’t be Considered Violation of FRs  ||  Bom. HC: Can Proceed with Trial if Accused Neither Appears Nor Seeks Exemption from Attendance  ||  Bom. HC: Cannot Breach Fundamental Rights of Residents Merely because they Feed Dogs  ||  Del. HC: While Calculating Compensation, Family Pension Paid to Deceased’s Family Cannot be Deducted  ||  Del. HC: Department Can't Hold Compliance once Court Orders Release of Bank Guarantee by Trader  ||  Allahabad HC: Cannot Claim Use of Loudspeakers as a Matter of Right    

SC: Magistrate Must Ensure if Complaint Constitutes Only Civil Wrong Before Summoning Accused - (04 Jan 2023)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that when the violation of law alleged is clearly debatable and doubtful, the Magistrate must ensure clarification of the ambiguities, and should not pass a summoning order under Section 204 CrPC lightly or as a matter of course.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SUMMONING ORDER   COMPLAINT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved