Supreme Court: Expecting a Minor to Respond to a Public Court Notice is ‘Perverse’  ||  SC: Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Applies to S. 11 Arbitration Act, Barring Fresh Arbiration After Abandonment  ||  SC: Later Sanction Requirement Won’t Invalidate Cognizance Taken When No Prior Bar Existed  ||  SC: Documents Not Admitted by an Employee in an Enquiry Must be Proved Through Witnesses  ||  Delhi HC: MHA Has Authority to Initiate Disciplinary Proceedings Against AGMUT IAS Officers  ||  MP HC: Financial Hardship or Mere Allegations of Lawyer’s Negligence Cannot Excuse Delayed Appeal  ||  Patna HC: Blanket Approach of Denying Public Employment to Individuals Named in an FIR is Unfair  ||  Kerala HC: Repeated Possession of Even Small Quantities of Narcotic Drugs Can Invoke KAAPA  ||  Calcutta HC: Employers May Deduct Penal Rent From Gratuity of Employees Refusing to Vacate Quarters  ||  Calcutta High Court: ECI Not Singling Out Bengal, More Transfers in Other Poll-Bound States    

SC: Failure to Send Seized Clothes to Forensics Insignificant Once Court Believes Survivor's Story - (25 Nov 2022)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that once court believes statement of a survivor of sexual assault, it is sufficient to establish an offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC and failure of police to send seized articles to forensic science laboratory would not affect the outcome in such a case.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SEXUAL ASSAULT   FORENSIC LABORATORY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved