NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Request for extension of time for filing response in sunset review of antidumping duty imposed on imports of 'High Tenacity Polyester Yarn' from China PR- (Ministry of Commerce and Industry) (02 Nov 2022)

MANU/COMM/0188/2022

Commercial

1. With respect to the above-mentioned subject investigations, request has been received from Exporter/Producer for extension of time to file Questionnaire Responses.

2. The request has been considered and it has been decided to grant additional time to file the Questionnaire Response by 25 November 2022.

3. It is advised that all the interested producers / exporters / importers / users may file their response within the stipulated time as extended above. Since, the investigation is time bound, no further request for extension of time would be considered by the Authority.

4. This issues with the approval of Designated Authority.

Tags : EXTENSION   TIME   ANTIDUMPING DUTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved