Allahabad High Court: Husband's Liability under the Domestic Violence Act Continues Despite Divorce  ||  Bombay HC: Municipal Council Must Pay for Land Used as DP Road Despite Fund Shortage  ||  Uttarakhand HC: Previous Service Pay Protection Does Not Confer Right to Career Progression Benefits  ||  Supreme Court Revives POCSO Case Against Headmistress, Says Verifying Abuse Claims is No Excuse  ||  SC: Voluminous Documents are No Excuse For Their Delayed Production under Commercial Courts Act  ||  Supreme Court Orders Merged Bank's Eviction For Transferring Tenancy Without Landlord's Consent  ||  SC: Oraon Tribe Custom Doesn't Allow Uncle-In-Law to Adopt Niece's Husband as Ghar Damad  ||  Kerala HC Approves New Public Prosecutor Appointment Guidelines After a Minor Revision  ||  Rajasthan HC Clarifies Criminal Writ Petitions Have No Separate Constitutional Status  ||  Delhi HC Clarifies if Whatsapp Acknowledgment Can Make an Arbitral Award Binding    

SC: Party Who Was Not Supplier on Date of Entering Into Contract Can’t Seek Benefit Under MSMED Act - (02 Nov 2022)

COMMERCIAL

Supreme Court has held that a party who was not 'supplier' on the date of entering into contract cannot seek any benefit as the 'supplier' under the MSMED Act, 2006 and if any registration is obtained subsequently the same would have an effect prospectively.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   MSMED   SUPPLIER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved