SC: Authorities Directed to Take Immediate Measures Regarding Municipal Solid Waste in Delhi  ||  Del. HC: In-Mall Marketing Campaigns Also Advertisements, HUL Restrained from Comparing Products  ||  Andhra Pradesh HC: Cannot Cancel Selection Process in Absence of Valid, Bonafide Reasons  ||  SC: Cannot Make Advocates Liable for Deficiency of Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986  ||  Cal HC: Not Operating in Totalitarian State, Govt. Can’t Exercise Blanket Power Over Every Instit.  ||  Mad. HC: Can’t Deny Permission of Temple’s Festival on Grounds of Model Code of Conduct  ||  All. HC: Mentioning Certain Sections in Title of Claim Made to Labour Court Won’t Determine Jurisdi.  ||  Orissa High Court: Can’t Apply Principle of ‘No Work, No Pay’ Universally  ||  SC: Delay in Reporting Seizure Report to Magistrate Won’t Vitiate Act of Seizure by Police  ||  Kar. HC: For Disqua. Under Gram Swaraj & Panchayat Act, Subsisting Contract With Panchayat Necessary    

DCDRC Holds Uber Liable for Driver's Negligence Leading Passenger to Miss Her Flight - (27 Oct 2022)

CONSUMER

District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (DCDRC), Mumbai has held Uber responsible for the driver’s negligence and directed Uber to pay a lawyer Rs. 20,000 for a missed flight to Chennai owing to delays caused by the driver.

Tags : DCDRC   UBER   NEGLIGENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved