Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law  ||  Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case  ||  Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies  ||  Delhi High Court: Students Having Zero Attendance Cannot be Promoted to the Next Semester  ||  J&K&L HC: Replacing 'State' With 'Union Territory' in Public Safety Act Does Not Change its Nature  ||  Kerala High Court: Doctor Cannot Enrol as an Advocate Without First Cancelling Medical Registration  ||  Supreme Court: VAT is Not Applicable on Reliance’s Inter-State Gas Supply from KG Basin to UP  ||  Supreme Court: Co-Owner Can File Eviction Suit as Landlord under Bombay Rent Act  ||  Supreme Court: Mediclaim Reimbursement Cannot be Set off Against Accident Compensation  ||  SC: Hindu Succession Act 2005 Amendment Does Not Curtail Daughters’ Existing Inheritance Rights    

Delhi HC: Use of The Word 'Can' in an Arbitration Clause Does Not Render it Ineffective - (13 Oct 2022)

ARBITRATION

Delhi High Court has held that mere use of the word 'can' in an arbitration clause does not render it ineffective and the intention of the parties to go for arbitration is to be determined on a complete reading of all relevant clauses.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION   INTENTION OF PARTIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved