Allahabad HC: Victim Compensation under POCSO Act Cannot be Withheld For Lack of Injury Report  ||  MP HC: Diverting Goods From Delivery Point is Misappropriation under S.407 IPC  ||  Delhi HC: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 as They Do Not Perform Public Functions  ||  Delhi HC: Pending Probate Proceedings Do Not Prevent Filing FIR For Alleged Will Forgery  ||  Ker HC: Dismissal For Default Alone Cannot Justify Rejecting Restoration Plea For Lack of Vigilance  ||  SC: Disclosure Statements Alone Cannot Secure Conviction Without a Complete Chain of Evidence  ||  Supreme Court Orders Reporting of Student Suicides and Bans Denial of Classes or Exams  ||  SC: Govt Can Exclude Overqualified Candidates From Posts Requiring Lower Qualifications  ||  SC: Contracts to Hire Global Speakers For Media Summits are Not Taxable as Event Management Services  ||  SC: Mandatory Injunction Suit Alone is Not Maintainable When Plaintiff’s Title is Disputed    

Bom HC: State's Obligation to Protect Citizens from Wild Animal, Any Injury Caused is Govt's Failure - (27 Sep 2022)

CIVIL

Bombay High Court has held that while it is State’s duty to protect wild animals and not allow them to wander outside restricted zone, it is also obligatory upon state to protect citizens from any injuries by wild animals, and if any injury is caused, it is State’s failure to protect right to life.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   WILD ANIMAL   STATE OBLIGATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved