Supreme Court: Wait-Listed Candidates Have No Vested Right After List Expiry  ||  SC: Reserved Candidates Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must be Considered For Open Posts  ||  SC: AICTE Regulations Do Not Govern Direct Recruitment of Engineering Professors by State PSCs  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts To Decide Article 226(3) Applications Within Two Weeks  ||  SC: State Agencies are Competent To Probe Corruption Cases Against Central Government Officers  ||  Allahabad High Court: Wife May Claim Education Expenses; Adverse Inference If Husband Hides Income  ||  Patna High Court: Cruelty Claims Against In-Laws are Unlikely Without Shared Residence or Interaction  ||  Patna HC: Aadhaar and GPS-Based Attendance For Medical College Faculty Does Not Violate Privacy  ||  Allahabad HC: Victim Compensation under POCSO Act Cannot be Withheld For Lack of Injury Report  ||  MP HC: Diverting Goods From Delivery Point is Misappropriation under S.407 IPC    

Bom HC: State's Obligation to Protect Citizens from Wild Animal, Any Injury Caused is Govt's Failure - (27 Sep 2022)

CIVIL

Bombay High Court has held that while it is State’s duty to protect wild animals and not allow them to wander outside restricted zone, it is also obligatory upon state to protect citizens from any injuries by wild animals, and if any injury is caused, it is State’s failure to protect right to life.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   WILD ANIMAL   STATE OBLIGATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved